There are systemic aspects of the banking, monetary, and economic system that are not taught in the schools and universities of the world and are rarely discussed on corporate owned news and media networks. Knowledge of these is absolutely essential for everyone in the world that wishes to understand how the economic world ‘actually’ works and how worldwide society has been shackled to vast unpayable government debt, while the vast resources of human productivity and of nature are continually exploited by a small group of people that control these systems.
In modern times, the same privately-owned banking power structure exists and wields vast influence regardless of whether a country utilises systems of capitalism, socialism or communism; and regardless of whether the democrats or the republicans are in government in the U.S. A similar dynamic is in play in Europe and in many countries regardless of so-called ‘left’ wing or ‘right’ wing political parties winning elections. More and more people are realizing that regardless of political posturing and election promises that behind the scenes both left and right are simply wings of the same bird. With the real power lying with ultra-rich financial and banking ulteriors that are in control of the debt-money creation process.
For example, it is notable that the administration of U.S. President Obama (a Democrat) provided a multi-trillion-dollar bailout to the banking sector in 2008. Then, in 2020, another bailout occurred (see Endnote [i]), the administration of President Trump (a Republican) executed a proposal that deployed a $454 billion slush fund established by the Treasury in partnership with the Federal Reserve. This fund could, in turn, be leveraged to provide over $4 trillion in Federal Reserve bailout credit to banks and the major asset management companies that essentially own and control the world economy (which are in turn largely owned by private mega-banks). An article titled ‘Another bank bailout under cover of a virus’ posted on May 18, 2020 by Ellen Brown (chair of the U.S. Public Banking Institute) described the 2020 bailout as follows:
“Insolvent Wall Street banks have been quietly bailed out again in 2020... Many economists in the US and Europe argued that the next time the banks failed they should be nationalized – taken over by the government as public utilities. But that opportunity was lost… There was no bail-in of private funds, no heated congressional debate, and no public vote. It was all done unilaterally by unelected bureaucrats at the Federal Reserve… While the public was distracted with protests, riots and lockdowns, BlackRock suddenly emerged from the shadows to become the “fourth branch of government,” managing the controls to the central bank’s print-on-demand fiat money.” – Ellen Brown
It appears the origin of this control is connected with the major private banking families / houses, including the Rothschilds banking dynasty. Let us take a step back in history to examine the influence of the Rothschild banking family of Frankfurt, Germany, (See Endnote [ii]) the most famous banking house in history and an enduring symbol of international finance, investment banking, and Jewish intrigue. The Rothschild bank rose to economic power in the nineteenth century, with branches throughout Europe; and the political influence of the family for the past 200 years has been outlined by various academics and authors. Jean Bouvier, Professor of Economics at the University of Paris and Author of ‘Les Rothschild’ described the family as “the most famous of all European banking dynasties, which for some 200 years exerted great influence on the economic and, indirectly, the political history of Europe… Successive generations of the Rothschild family have been similarly active in international finance and politics… the Rothschilds were influencing the national economy and politics of their countries..” (see Endnote [iii]). According to Benjamin Ginsberg: “By the mid- [nineteenth] century… the entire European state system was dependent upon the international financial networks dominated by the Rothschilds.” (see Endnote [iv]). Howard Sachar, Professor Emeritus of History and International Affairs at the George Washington University, has asserted that “instances occurred… in which the Rothschilds demonstrably altered the course of international politics” (see Endnote [v]). It appears a central aspect of the Rothschild plan was secrecy. According to Professor Sam Lehman Wilzig: “The extent to which [the Rothschilds] followed this strategy [of secrecy] bordered on the incredible. To this day their records have not been made public.” (see Endnote [vi]).
The following is an extract from a July 8, 1937, article from The New York Times’s print archive.
“BERLIN, July 7 [1937].-The first congress of German historians under the National Socialist régime… Professor Wilhelm Grau delivered an attack on the House of Rothschild as the despotism of Jewish finance. He said: “The Rothschilds introduced the rule of money into European politics. Money without a fatherland, without a soul and without faith became the dominating influence in politics…. This idea is closely related to that of the Marxists. Rothschild and [Karl] Marx were brothers in blood and in spirit. National Socialism’s victory struck the first real blow to an international of this form and recalled the nations to their real duties.”
Asserting that there was hardly a European State not in debt to the Rothschilds in the first half of the nineteenth century, Professor Grau charged that they controlled foreign policy. He said that relations with various European nations became part of the financial system of the Rothschilds and other Jewish capitalists and were so manipulated as to bring a maximum of profit.
The Rothschilds, he also said, had no principle in their manipulation of European foreign policy except the desire for gain because they held that by piling up wealth they could best help their less powerful Jewish brethren. Since 1878, Professor Grau said, the House of Rothschild has been anti-German. He pointed out that the house never published its archives.” – New York Times, July 8, 1937, (see Endnote [vii])
In a book titled Causes and Effects of the First World War (reprinted in 1986), British army Captain Kenneth McKilliam described that the Rothschild bank was centrally involved in commissioning Karl Marx to write the Communist Manifesto. Such assertions have been described as conspiracy theory by the Jewish owned/controlled media and internet platforms. McKilliam wrote as follows:
“The 1914-18 conflict was not brought on by nationalist rivalries, as popularly supposed, but by sinister revolutionary forces operating behind the scenes…. In 1833 The League of the Twelve Just Men of the ‘Illuminati’ secret society organised a fraternity, the B’nai B’rith, to bring about the fulfilment of the ‘Covenant,’ the supposed messianic rule of the Jews over all other people. The leader was Lionel de Rothschild, who founded the Rothschild’s bank in London. Father Nathaniel was himself the son of Meyer Amschel Rothschild, the founder of the Rothschild banking clan and one who worked with Adam Weishaupt to establish the Order of the Illuminati on May 1st (May Day) 1776.
In 1848, Karl Marx (real name Mordecai Levi) was commissioned by the League of the Twelve Just Men to write the Communist Manifesto, based on the Babylonian Talmud and the writings of Weishaupt. In the same year, revolutions broke out all over Europe and beyond against the established order.
The Jew Blumenthal, editor of Judisk Tidshrift in Sweden, wrote in issue no. 75 of that paper in 1929: “. . Only recently our race has given the world a new prophet, but he has two faces and bears two names: on the one side his name is Rothschild, leader of all the capitalists, and on the other side Karl Marx, the apostle of those who want to destroy the others.
Rene Gros wrote in Le Nouveau Mercurie (Paris, 1927): “The two internationals of Finance and Revolution work with ardor; they are the two fronts of the Jewish International … There is a Jewish conspiracy against all nations.”
Benjamin Disraeli [who twice served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom] wrote in The Life of Lord George Bentinck (1852): “The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe . . . the abrogation of property is proclaimed by the secret societies, which form the provisional governments of Europe, and men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them.”
In 1840 the Jewish poet Heine wrote: “… it would be war, the ghastliest war of destruction; the second act is the European and world revolution… There may be only one flock and one shepherd with an iron staff (the Jews)”
Disraeli wrote: “Governments do not govern, but merely control the machinery of government being themselves controlled by the Hidden Hand.” The Paris magazine Peuple Juive (January 9th, 1919) said: “The world revolution which we will experience will be exclusively our affair and will rest in our hands. This revolution will tighten the Jewish domination over other people.”
The following example illustrates the reality that it is not voting and elections that have pivotal control of national and international politics, wars, and economies; rather it is the moneyed influence of privately owned mega-banks. For example, it has been documented (see Endnote [viii]) that New York bankers provided massive funding to the initially very small Bolshevik/Communist party in Russia in 1917. Without this vast financial support the party would have quickly vanished and communism would never have been adopted and implemented at a country-level. This also fits with the assertion that communism was created and funded by (privately-owned) mega-banks based in western capitalist countries.
In this paragraph I reference the research on this topic detailed in the book Lessons in Spiritual Economics from the Bhagavad Gita by Dhanesvara das, see Endnote [ix]. Antony Sutton, a scholar at the prestigious Hoover Institute, investigated the connection between the capitalists and communism. He wrote the major study Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development, describing how the west played a major role in developing the Soviet Union from its very beginnings up until 1970. In a volume titled Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution he detailed the relationship of New York’s Wall St banks and the Bolsheviks, the revolutionaries that started communism in Russia. Decades later, the US government de-classified related documents and Sutton found evidence in the State Department Decimal File, particularly the 861.00 section, linking some New York international bankers and many revolutionaries, including the Bolsheviks. Russian General Arsene de Goulevitch wrote in Czarism and the Revolution “the main purveyors of funds for the revolution… came from certain American and British circles”, see Endnote [x].
Sutton’s study provides photographic date-stamped evidence of the money transfers from the New York bankers and the Bolsheviks. Banking magnate Jacob Schiff contributed $20 million, a vast sum at the time, according to his grandson John, see Endnote [xi]. William Boyce Thompson, a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, a large stockholder in the Rockefeller-controlled Chase Bank, contributed 1$ million. The Jewish Communal Register of New York City, 1917-18, confirmed that “Mr. Schiff financed the enemies of autocratic Russia”. Banking magnate Max Warburg was also involved in the dispersion of large payments to Lenin, Trotsky and others. Obviously if these Jewish capitalist bankers were financing communism they had no fear of international communism, the so-called “mortal foe of the capitalists”.
“Will you say for me to those present at tonight’s meeting how deeply I regret my inability to celebrate with the Friends of Russian Freedom the actual reward of what we hoped for and striven for these long years! ” 11 – Jacob Schiff (of the New York bankers, ‘Kuhn, Loeb & Co). – New York Times, March 24th 1917.
“Today it is estimated even by Jacob Schiff’s grandson, John Schiff, a prominent member of New York society, that the old man sank about $20,000,000 for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia.” – Cholly Knickerbocker, N.Y American Journal, February 3rd 1949
The royal family in Russia was quickly toppled in 1917 in the banker-funded ‘Bolshevik revolution’. The Bolsheviks had been a tiny party in Russia, but now they received vast funding primarily from New York-based and also from German-based banks.
So, we see banking ‘capitalists’ provided vast funds to finance the rise of communism in Russia. In the decades that followed, western corporations established vast commercial contracts with resource-rich Russia in liaison with the communists that came to power. Meanwhile, the communists in power were responsible for the death of over 60 million (mostly white Christian) people (See Endnote [xii]) in the Soviet Union countries of Russia, Ukraine, etc., over the following decades.
The formation of the communist Soviet Union was the capitalist’s dream come true: monopolies on an entire empire dealing through only one agent, the communist government. By 1931, western corporations had immensely lucrative contracts for the exploitation, development and manufacturing of Russian resources across all economic sectors, as detailed in the book Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Anthony Sutton, see Endnote [xiii]. Dumitru Bacu, a Romanian author, who lived in Romania before and during the tragic and fratricidal Second World War also describes this as follows:
“..the Bolshevik capture of Russia was, of course, planned, financed, and directed by the Schiffs, Warburgs… The students were also expected to believe or pretend that “capitalism” included the international lords of finance, who have always found their Soviet colony an extremely profitable investment both in itself and as a means of exploiting their control over the money and banking of nations that are told that they are “free”. – Dumitru Bacu, Author
The Soviet Union (USSR) was a transcontinental country that spanned much of Eurasia from 1922 to 1991. It appears to have been an intentionally cultivated myth that the capitalist U.S. and communist Russia/USSR were enemies, and that nothing could be further from the truth. In reality, the U.S. government ‘moneyocracy’ has often utilised the so-called ‘threat of communist Russia’ to justify the trillions of dollars spent on military projects to the boon of military industrial mega-corporations. The political stand-off known as the ‘cold war’ that is supposed to have existed between the US and the USSR after WWII was nothing more than a corporate-media-generated hoax. This is further detailed in the book The $5 Trillion Cold War Hoax by Eustace Mullins. These Jewish capitalist elites created and funded communism. Capitalism and communism are, in reality, tools of the one financial power group operating behind elected political figureheads that are essentially puppets with no real independent power. Various authors have identified this, for example, Louis Marschalko, in his book The World Conquerors – The Real War Criminals, states the following:
““Either as American banker or as Soviet Commissar we form but one nation.”… Capitalism and Bolshevism, the two great ruling systems of our modern age, are not two opposing movements… rather they present two different forms of expression… to obtain world power… The attempt to bring about a conflict between Capitalism and Bolshevism is therefore a most terrible deception. ” – Louis Marschalko, Author
“There is little difference whether one is forced to work for a capitalist master or a communist one. Both the capitalists and communists have created an economics of ignorance through cruelty, force, violence and death. In both cases the labour of millions is usurped by a small minority who accrue wealth to their own advantage, and there is no significant difference between the two.“ – Dhanesvara das, Author
So, we see the motivations of power, greed and brutal control exist regardless of which political ideology is applied or political label used. Collectivization under the communist leader Stalin in essence forced people to work on collective farms or factories, and was opposed by millions of people. Those that opposed were executed, sent to forced labour camps or were forcibly starved of access to grain. The total death toll for the collectivization program was on the order of twelve million (estimated from official Soviet figures) and between 1930 and 1950 more than 20 million Russians and German prisoners of war are estimated to have died in forced labour camps. (Note that huge numbers of Europeans and Russians fought with Germany in WW2 against what they saw as the genocidal ravages of Jewish-funded communism.)
It is interesting to note that after World War One, the German government followed the lead of the American green backers and issued its own fiat money (money to be created as debt-free and interest-free money), rather than going down the subservient path of paying interest on debt-money created by the privately owned international banking system.
In relation to the reasons for World War Two, Dr. Henry Makow, a Canadian researcher, has stated:
“(Hitler) took over for himself the privilege of manufacturing money…and put it to work for the benefit of the state… Are you capable of imagining what would have come… if it (this process of taking the money creation away from the international private owned banks) had infected a number of other states ”
Stephen Zarlenga, Author of the book ‘The Lost Science of Money’ also suggests a reason that it not found in the history books of today:
“(Germany’s) decision to use alternatives to gold, would mean that the international financiers would be unable to exercise this control (over Germany) through the international gold standard,.. And this may have led to controlling Germany through warfare instead.”
Author Sheldron Emry, Author the book ‘Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People’ has stated:
“Germany financed its entire government and war operation from 1935 to 1945 without gold and without debt, and it took the whole Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German power over Europe and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers. Such history of money does not even appear in the textbooks of the public schools today.”
“Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws” — quote attributed to Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
In the 1860s U.S. President Abraham Lincoln printed interest-free and debt-free paper money, called Greenbacks. Lincoln printed $449 million dollars’ worth of Greenbacks (the exact amount being $449,338,902), money that he delegated to be created as debt-free and interest-free money.
”The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.” – Abraham Lincoln
Greenbacks represented manhours rather than gold or silver. They were only backed by credibility of the government and were used to pay soldiers and government employees and buy supplies for the civil war. It served as legal tender for all debts, public and private. Shortly after that happened, The London Times printed the following:
“If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe (See Endnote [xiv])”.
The bankers obviously understood that the only thing that is a threat to their power and world domination is sovereign governments printing interest-free and debt-free paper money. They knew what Lincoln’s initiative would do to their vulnerable house of cards, debt-creating power base i.e., it would break the power of the privately owned banks. The threat of sovereign governments printing interest-free and debt-free paper money had to be removed, and it was.
The private mega-banks increased their domination of the money creation process via the Federal Reserve coup in 1913, as described in the book Demonic Economics and the Tricks of the Bankers. Since then a private banking elite have wielded vast world influence being able to fund any agenda they wish by creating debt-money.
By 2020 virtually all governments of the world were in vast debt, see Endnote [xv]. These debts are the debt-money loans that the international private-bankers created from nothing. For many decades, the international privately owned banking system has created debt-money from nothing and charged all governments and people often extortionist interest on it (usury). By this and other mechanisms, a banking elite usurped a significant percentage of the profits of the world’s nations. This resulted in immense wealth and political power for a tiny minority that have private ownership of the world’s mega-banks, but, placed a financial debt burden on the nations of the world. The cruel hoax is that governments, or the people could have created and issued this money themselves, via public banking. Yet, we have seen what happened when this was done by Germany in the 1930s – the international bankers orchestrated a World War against Germany – despite multiple offers of peace Germany was attacked on two sides (by the Western governments and communist controlled Russia).
In addition, because the mega-banks demand interest on debt-money issued to governments, the people of the world are shackled to a treadmill of paying off interest on vast debts. This is actually a trick of austerity against the people as the interest portion and debt can never be fully re-paid as the interest portion of the debt-money was never created, i.e. there is never enough money in circulation to pay the interest and the debt.
The real reason governments holler about the need for GDP growth is that it is needed so that tax monies can be generated by the population to pay vast amounts of interest to the international banking system. Governments will always contend that growth will benefit people of each nation, but GDP growth is not an accurate measure of human wellbeing. According to the research paper ‘Beyond GDP: Measuring and achieving global genuine progress’ (see Endnote [xvi]) published in the Journal of Ecological Economics in 2013 by authors, including Professor Tim Jackson and ecological economist Robert Constanza:
“While global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has increased more than three-fold since 1950, economic welfare as estimated by the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), has actually decreased since 1978.”
This control of credit (debt-money) also extends to commercial banks. Commercial banks have made vast profits by mass producing phony credit via fractional reserve banking. This is in essence the practice of allowing banks the special privilege to sub-let people’s money deposits many times over without their consent (without the permission of the account holder) – a form of legal privilege that extends to no other area of business that I am aware of. This enables commercial banks to lend over 40 times the amount of credit that they actually hold in the form of money deposit and claim interest on it.
Furthermore, it has been a myth that the GDP growth and globalisation system “floated all boats”. The real economic welfare of the 99% of society, as estimated by the Genuine Progress Indicator, has decreased since 1978. The pseudo-science of contemporary economics is the narrative used by all governments amidst the chaos. In a truly free market people and countries would not be shackled by phony debt; and the pseudoscience of economics that serves the masters of that phony debt. In an article, author John McMurtry, an elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada and author of the book ‘The Cancer Stage of Capitalism/from Crisis to Cure’, describes:
“The fatally absurd economic box within which we have been conditioned to conform at a preconscious level remains life-blind at every step without knowledge of it… Contemporary Economics is a Pseudo-Science. None of this can be seen by ‘Economics’ because it is a pseudo-science. Its ruling categories are disconnected from reality…. life requirements are assumed away a-priori… Consequences follow in the long run that are predictably fatal to human and planetary life organisation. Yet whatever does not fit this a-priori life-blind construction is heretical in graduate schools supplying economic advisers to governments and corporations, and taboo in the corporate press and media to the extent of its contradiction.”
The debt-based game of snakes and ladders (economic boom-bust-bailouts in which bankers are not allowed to lose) has been ongoing worldwide for decades. Meanwhile, a system of world communist control has been in the shadowy background; and the mega-corporate-owned media has been fully complicit. Consider the following quotes:
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” – David Rockefeller, in an address before, the Trilateral Commission, in June of 1991
“Some people might get as far as seeing the corporate control, some people might see the banker control, the central banking control, some people might get as far as seeing Israel’s role and don’t get any further… Some people get to the Rothschilds all 100 trillion dollars… The Rothschilds take the heat for the rest of the Crown Corporation… bloodlines… The Crown created the idea of corporations, the East India Company was the first, to shield the individual from liability… what we have to do is remove the corporation” – Dean Henderson, Author
It appears that over the past century people have become more and more like shackled slaves of a world institutional system that simultaneously advances mega-corporate control for so-called elites and communist-type totalitarian politics for the masses. What ‘they’ don’t want you to know is that in these times governments are registered corporations in perpetual debt to privately-owned mega-banks and are designed to tax and control you; and in the U.S in 1933, government policy was introduced to permanently protect the bankers. For more information see the book Demonic Economics and the Tricks of the Bankers. Consider the words of author, Mary Elizabeth Croft:
“We are the collateral for the interest on the loan of the World Bank. Each of us is registered, via the application for a birth certificate. The Treasury issues a bond on the birth certificate and the bond is sold at a securities exchange and bought by the FRB/BoC, which then uses it as collateral to issue bank notes. The bond is held in trust for the Feds at the Depository Trust Corporation. We are the surety on said bonds. Our labour/energy is then payable at some future date. Hence we become the ‘transmitting utility’ for the transmission of energy. The USG/CAG, in order to provide necessary goods and services, created a commercial bond (promissory note), by pledging the property, labour, life and body of its citizens, as payment for the debt (bankruptcy). This commercial bond made chattel (property) out of us all We became nothing more than ‘human resources’ and collateral for the debt. This was without our knowledge and/or our consent, via the filing (registration) of our birth certificates. When mums apply for a birth certificate, the application is registered. The legal title of her baby is then transferred from mum to the State…
What we need to know is the results: unjust taxation, multiplying home costs, increased medical costs, control of energy and resources, control of elections and political principles, and the undermining of every social process by multiplying cost. The central banks, via the IMF/World Bank, have engulfed the world in a mathematically impossible debt-based debt/credit monetary system… The Federal Reserve Bank is now in every country in the world… We are entrenched in a game of commerce about which we have been kept in the dark for the purpose of our slavery.” – Mary Elizabeth Croft Author, Author, (listed with kind permission).
The book Demonic Economics and the Tricks of the Bankers provides additional analysis along with Endnotes, and citations. Additional information in relation to the role of banking in the bogus UN climate agenda, World War II, and communism, is also detailed in chapters in the book Transcending the Climate Change Deception Toward Real Sustainability.
Author: Reality Books
Mark Keenan at Realitybooks.co.uk is an independent researcher and former scientist at the UK Government Dept. of Energy and Climate Change; and at United Nations Environment.
The following books are available on Amazon, Reality Books, Barnes & Noble, and Fable.
[i] The article is available at: https://ellenbrown.com/2020/05/18/another-bank-bailout-under-cover-of-a-virus/#more-14792
Ellen Brown’s blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.
[ii] Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family
Description of Jewish Economic Influence available at: http://holywar.org/jewishtr/06money.htm
[iii] Source: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Rothschild-family
[iv] Ginsberg, Benjamin. The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1994.
[v] Sachar, Howard M. The Course of Modern Jewish History. New Revised Edition. Vintage Books, NY, 1990
Sachar, Howard M. Diaspora. An Inquiry into the Contemporary Jewish World, Harper and Row, Publishers, New York, Cambridge, Philadelphia …, 1985
[vi] Lehman-Wilzig, Sam. What is Jewish Heroism? Page 254. Midstream, June/July 1989, pp. 21-25
Ginsberg, Benjamin. The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State. Page 18. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1994.
[vii] Source: https://www.nytimes.com/1937/07/08/archives/rothschild-linked-to-marx-by-nazis-german-historian-terms-the-two.html
[viii] Sources: The book ‘The Web of Debt’ by E.H. Brown, pg 226 and pg 227. 2nd Edition 2008.
The book ‘Transcending the Global Power Game’ by Armin Risi, pg 88. First advance run – January 2004.
[ix] Research on this topic is detailed in the book Lessons in Spiritual Economics from the Bhagavad Gita by Dhanesvara das (Don Rousse), (p.160-170). Copyright 2009-2010. Available at: http://spiritual-econ.blogspot.com/
[x] Source: US State Department Report, Papers Relating to Foreign Relations of the United States, 1918. Published in 1931, Vol 1, (p.371-376).
[xi] Source: Knickerbocker Glory of the New York Journal American, February 3rd, 1949
[xii] Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes
[xiii] Sources: Anthony Sutton, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Chapter 4. Dhaesvara das, Lessons in Spiritual Economics from the Bhagavad Gita, (p.164-170)
[xiv] Source: https://www.whiteoutpress.com/who-really-assassinated-abe-lincoln-and-john-f-kennedy583/
[xv] Sources: https://www.therichest.com/rich-countries/the-only-5-countries-in-the-world-living-debt-free/
https://datatopics.worldbank.org/debt/ids/
[xvi] Ecological Economics. Volume 93, September 2013, Pages 57-68. Ida Kubiszewski, Robert Costanza, Carol Franco, Philip Lawn, John Talberth, Tim Jackson, Camille Aylmer. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800913001584
